Wheaton College (Illinois): Historical Stance on Israel and the Jewish People, 1860s–2020s

A Decade-by-Decade Research Brief by Brett Henry

<aside> <img src="notion://custom_emoji/49cd1284-3aa8-4d37-9130-6c36dada68f2/2b5ccc30-3aed-8026-940a-007ab288a05d" alt="notion://custom_emoji/49cd1284-3aa8-4d37-9130-6c36dada68f2/2b5ccc30-3aed-8026-940a-007ab288a05d" width="40px" />

I, Brett Henry, approach this topic as a committed and nuanced Christian Zionist. My theological convictions are rooted in God’s covenant with Abraham and in the ongoing significance of the Jewish people, the modernly and prophetically reformed State of Israel, and the Land of Israel within the Biblical canon. Precisely for that reason, I have worked to bracket my conclusions and let the record speak. What follows is not an apologetic but a historical mapping of Wheaton’s posture toward the Jewish people, the Land of Israel, and the modern State of Israel—constructed to be as fact‑forward, citation‑heavy, and fair to divergent readings as possible, so that colleagues can engage the same evidence even where they dissent from my own theological commitments.

</aside>

Methodological Frame & Evidentiary Boundaries

Sources & Approach

This research synthesizes publicly accessible materials to map Wheaton College’s evolving stance toward the Jewish people, the Land of Israel as theological space, and the modern State of Israel. Primary materials include:

• Billy Graham Center Archives (digitized collections on Blackstone Memorial, Chicago Hebrew Mission, American Messianic Fellowship)[1][2]
• Wheaton institutional publications (program descriptions, course catalogs, Historical Review Task Force reports)[3][4][5]
• The Wheaton Record (student newspaper coverage of contemporary events)[6][7][8]
• Faculty writings and interviews (Burge, Graves, and others’ published reflections)[9][10]

Evidentiary Limits & Next Steps for Archival Work

Where this research is strong:

• Post-1890s institutional leadership positions (Blackstone Memorial, Chicago Hebrew Mission presidency)
• 1970s–present: study-abroad programs, faculty debates, student activism, interfaith partnerships
• Direct quotations from key figures (Graham, Burge, Isaac, Messianic Jewish students/faculty)

Where inference is necessary (archival gaps):

• 1860s–1880s: Jonathan Blanchard's personal theology of Jews/Israel beyond abolition and temperance writings
• 1920s–1940s: Internal institutional positions on Jewish students, faculty, and quotas (no digitized evidence located)
• 1948, 1967, Intifadas: Institutional responses at the time of these events (presidential statements, trustee minutes, chapel themes)

Recommended next-level archival work:

1. Systematic search of The Wheaton Record archive (1920s–present) for references to Jews, Israel, Zionism, Palestine
2. President’s office correspondence files: responses to Balfour Declaration (1917), Israeli statehood (1948), Six-Day War (1967)
3. Trustee and faculty senate minutes during First Intifada (1987–93), Second Intifada (2000–05), and Gaza conflicts (2008–09, 2014, 2023–25)
4. Billy Graham personal papers at BGC for unpublished correspondence with Israeli leaders and Jewish organizations
5. Admissions office records beyond the 1929–46 quota period to trace when and how Jewish applicant tracking formally ended

Conceptual Framework: Three Interwoven Yet Distinct Categories

To understand Wheaton’s historical stance, we must distinguish three categories that evangelical theology has often conflated:

1. The Jewish People (Ethno-Religious Community)

Who Jews are as persons and communities.